Friday, June 29, 2007
nytimes
i am waiting for a review of hampaw's show. what is going on at the times? they write a measly number of reviews, half of which seem completely random and I don't even read. it seems with the increase in the number of wizard's dens and the increase in the number of relic-showings that the times could step it up a little, right? the times art review editorial process is completely mystifying. if i started taking those pillz corny posted about that let you stay up for days with no ill effects then i could start my own relic review paper or something. i mean, really, the times is sucking it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
We may just have to start our own. It will be better, anyway. Rosetta Peedbody would be my pseudonym.
i saw it!!!
honestly, that is the first show i have seen at that space - of maybe three or four shows - that i've enjoyed.
me too,though didnt see it -crapped out by 24th st-but if i had...
man, they have the best juicy pork/red pepper/mustard sandwich at that sandwich shop inside the hallway of that building. i had it two days in a row.
was there a review of Hampaw's show in the Times FB?
Peeds, that is a good psuedonym. Mine would be Krix Fort.
The show will be up for a couple more weeks, so Roberta has time to GET A CLUE... sheesh!
Post a Comment